Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Otherness as an opportunity for recognition: female identity and cultural inclusion

Othering and Belonging. Costruzione e trattamento delle alterità

Abstract

Simone de Beauvoir, in “Le Deuxième Sexe” (1949), shows how female identity has been constructed as subordinate and defined in relation to that of men. Women have been confined to predetermined spaces and functions, and for centuries, their condition has been interpreted through categories of otherness and belonging. Perceived as “Other”, women have been relegated to roles and positions according to strict cultural conventions. In contemporary society, this notion of belonging becomes increasingly complex in the context of globalization, migration, cultural pluralism. We are faced with an ambivalence: on the one hand, women are prominent and protagonists in the processes of emancipation; on the other, they are still confronted with a structural and cultural marginalization.

This study aims to analyse how the female experience manages to transform otherness into an opportunity for recognition, and how women can redefine the concept of belonging in an inclusive and multicultural sense.

Keywords

otherness; female identity; recognition; belonging; cultural pluralism; emancipa-tion.

PDF (Italian)

References

  1. Barth F. (1998). Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
  2. Bauman Z. (1991). Modernità e ambivalenza. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  3. Bourdieu P. (2014). Il dominio maschile. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  4. Butler J. (2003). Questione di genere. Il femminismo e la sovversione dell’identità. Bari: Laterza.
  5. Corradi C. (2007). Il corpo della donna come luogo della guerra. Difesa sociale. Rivista trimestrale dell’Istituto Italiano di Medicina Sociale sui rapporti tra cultura, salute e società, LXXXVI (2): 5-18.
  6. Crenshaw K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6).
  7. De Beauvoir S. (1949). Le Deuxième Sexe. Paris: Gallimard.
  8. Fraser N., Honneth A. (2007). Redistribuzione o riconoscimento? Una critica politico-filosofica. Roma: Meltemi.
  9. Giddens A. (1994). La costituzione della società. Bologna: il Mulino.
  10. Hill Collins P. (2000). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
  11. Honneth A. (2002). Lotta per il riconoscimento. Milano: Il Saggiatore.
  12. Luhmann N. (1990). Sistemi sociali. Fondamenti di una teoria generale. Bologna: il Mulino.
  13. Luhmann N., De Giorgi R. (1991). Teoria della società. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  14. Marchetti S. (2011). Le ragazze di Asmara. Lavoro domestico e migrazione postcolo-niale. Roma: Ediesse.
  15. Marchetti S. (2014). Black Girls: Migrant Domestic Workers and Colonial Legacies. Boston: Brill.
  16. Mill J.S. (2019). La servitù delle donne (trad. it.: Barbara Gambaccini, 1869). Milano: Edizioni Clandestine.
  17. Okin S.M. (1999). Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  18. Rousseau J.-J. (2024). L’Emilio o dell’educazione (trad. it.: Andrea Potestio, 1762). Roma: Edizioni Studium.
  19. Sassen S. (1998). Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: The New Press.
  20. Simmel G. (1996). Le metropoli e la vita dello spirito. Milano: Armando Editore.
  21. Tajfel H. (1982). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.